Showing posts with label DIEP. SIEA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DIEP. SIEA. Show all posts

Upcoming Presentation: RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS FOR YOUNG WOMEN AFFECTED BY BREAST CANCER

Posted by admin on Saturday, October 9, 2010

I have been asked to speak at a free seminar for young women (age 40 or younger at their diagnosis) affected by breast cancer.

I will be discussing the latest in breast reconstruction option, including single-stage breast reconstruction and microsurgical techniques such as the DIEP flap, the SIEA flap and the TUG (inner thigh) flap: 


A few of my patients will be invited to also be there to share their personal stories about their reconstruction experience.

To RSVP, contact yscnorcal@youngsurvivalcoalition.org and visit http://womensplasticsurgery.com/about_horton.html#571 for more information on my practice.

Hope to see you there!
More aboutUpcoming Presentation: RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS FOR YOUNG WOMEN AFFECTED BY BREAST CANCER

Tomorrow: FREE live teleconference! Breast Reconstruction: Understanding Your Options

Posted by admin on Tuesday, July 27, 2010


Tomorrow, July 28th 2010, at 12:00 p.m. EST (9:00 a.m. Pacific time), I am honored to be speaking at the Living Beyond Breast Cancer's LIVE educational teleconference!

The topic is "Breast Reconstruction: Understanding Your Options".  

Educational Programs

Breast Reconstruction: Understanding Your Options

Our July teleconference will help you learn about your choices for breast reconstructive surgery


Join Living Beyond Breast Cancer for our next free teleconference, Breast Reconstruction: Understanding Your Options, from 12:00 p.m. to 1:15 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) on Wednesday, July 28.
Karen M. Horton, MD, MSc, FRCSC, a board certified plastic surgeon with Women’s Plastic Surgery, will help you learn about:
This teleconference will also discuss questions to help you explore whether you want to consider reconstructive surgery.

About Our Speaker
 
In addition to her board certification, Dr. Horton is a reconstructive microsurgeon. She practices in the Pacific Heights area of San Francisco.

Dr. Horton educates, empowers and informs women about options for breast reconstruction after cancer. Her goal is to use techniques that do not sacrifice major body muscles, enabling women to have reconstruction with the least number of stages. She specializes in microsurgical breast reconstruction, including DIEP flap, SIEA flap and TUG (inner thigh) flap.

Dr. Horton has published review book chapters on breast reconstruction. She presents clinical papers at national and international scientific meetings and has won research awards. Dr. Horton also specializes in "mommy makeover" cosmetic surgery for women.  Read more here!

About the Program
Our speaker will give a brief presentation, followed by a question-and-answer period. To participate, you need only a telephone or computer with Adobe Flash Player or Windows Media Player. Social workers may be eligible to receive continuing education credits; see our registration form for more details.


TO REGISTER, CLICK HERE! 

For those who cannot tune in online tomorrow, it will be recorded and an MP3 and PDF of my slides will be posted shortly on the Living Beyond Breast Cancer website.
More aboutTomorrow: FREE live teleconference! Breast Reconstruction: Understanding Your Options

Full "tummy tuck" closure with DIEP flap breast reconstruction... A good idea?

Posted by admin on Sunday, April 18, 2010

"It is possible to do rectus plication with DIEP flap donor site closure for a full abdominoplasty result"

Karen M. Horton, MD answers: Possible to do full tummy tuck while doing diep flap procedure?

I understand that the diep flap benefit of a real 'tummy tuck' is not covered by insurance. Is it reasonable to ask for the cost of a full tummy tuck (sewing together muscles, etc.) while the surgeon is performing a diep flap procedure? My surgeon seems very reluctant to even discuss outlying procedures such as abdominoplasty and liposuction, which I believe are both necessary to achieve the best final results. If I'm willing to pay for these procedures out of pocket, I don't know why my surgeon won't discuss them. Any insight appreciated.
Karen M. Horton, MD

When the DIEP flap (deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap) is used for microsurgical breast reconstruction, usually a small split is made in the muscle fascia (thick layer of collagen over top of the rectus abdominis muscles) to dissect out the blood vessels used for transplantation of skin and fat from the tummy to the breast.

Usually, the fascial split is simply closed, and the overlying anterior abdominal wall (sheet of skin and fat over the muscles of the trunk) is pulled tighter and closed, resulting in a tummy tuck scar.

It IS possible to perform rectus fascial plication (corsetting of the rectus abdominis muscles of the abdominal wall towards each other in the midline AT THE TIME of DIEP flap donor site closure.
However, doing so may change the pressures inside the abdominal cavity (i.e. on the stomach, intestines, diaphragm, etc) and may increase the risk of complications to the flap circulation in the short term. The worst case scenario would be to perform cosmetic steps during surgery and to lose the flap altogether!

Performing a full tummy tuck closure with the DIEP flap is something I HAVE performed successfully on a number of occasions, but patients must be very carefully selected and we would all have to be willing to accept an increased risk for complications.

I am currently reviewing my results on this combined procedure and will be presenting my work at upcoming meetings and in the form of a scientific paper, to be published on my website.

Often, the best solution is the simplest. On the day of your DIEP flap, it is usually best to focus only on microsurgical success. "Touch-ups" can be done any time in the future, including liposuction contouring of the abdomen (done in most of my patients) together with their nipple and areolar reconstruction, and/or rectus fascial plication, if needed.

See the photographs below of an example of rectus fascial plication done either at the time of DIEP flap donor site closure.  Trust your Microsurgeon to make the best decision for you, and to ensure a SAFE and SUCCESSFUL breast reconstruction as the #1 goal!

Karen M. Horton, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.
www.womensplasticsurgery.com


More aboutFull "tummy tuck" closure with DIEP flap breast reconstruction... A good idea?

Words of Thanks from a Breast Cancer Survivor

Posted by admin on Sunday, April 4, 2010


The following is a message from one of my patients who underwent bilateral skin-sparing mastectomies and immediate reconstruction using the DIEP/SIEA flap.  

Words like hers are the exact reason why being a Plastic Surgeon and Reconstructive Microsurgeon is so absolutely rewarding...

Dear Karen,

    My breasts are so beautiful. My torso, too. I'm overflowing with affection, appreciation and feelings of indebtedness towards you. This is so personal. YOU led me here. Not you, the doctor. Not you because this is your job. But the loving, caring, giving you. 


   Your training and gift as a surgeon are your vehicles but it's your heart and your soul that speak to the patient.You gave me the chance to put aside fear, stale ideas, and martyrdom (from childhood! YIKES! I didn't even know it was still there until all of this,) to reach in and stretch my uninformed "normal" view. When Dr. Richards first mentioned "reconstruction" I thought I had misunderstood. I had cancer. What does reconstruction have to do with that? Of course, everyone is familiar with breast cancer and, afterwards, reconstruction,  but these are remote concepts to those who have never experienced it.  

     "Let's just get rid of the cancer," I said to myself. "I don't need new boobs. They haven't been cute since I was last breast feeding. I'm already settled in with older-ish woman boobs, anyway. My middle-aged persona has been developed with older-ish woman boobs playing a key role. WHAT are they all talking about?" Now, I have breasts and they are lovely!

    When I met you, I was scared. Maybe you were the first person ever to say, " Joanne, What do YOU want? This is for you. Only you. What do you want ?" Maybe I was very receptive at that time in my life to consider such a question. My body, my choice. In those days, I would have been satisfied to get rid of the cancer, but I did consider your question . You gave me an open door to think about it. I did think about it. A lot. Before long I was able to decide that I did want new boobs. You know the rest of the story.

    Now that you've completed your magic on me, I feel so new. So alive. So complete. I haven't been swimming for awhile. Now I can't wait for summer.  My sexuallity was dormant. Now it is reawakened! I was a bit reclusive. Now I'm not. Each moment of my life has been improved, deepened, and is more satisfying since having received your care.

    I will be thanking you for the rest of my life for the most awesome and generous gift I have received from you. 

    Karen, I am so eternally grateful to you for staying with me at a time of great despair.

    With love, gratitude, and appreciation,

    Thanks so much, ~joanne

More aboutWords of Thanks from a Breast Cancer Survivor

The Art of Breast Reconstruction - 9th Annual Breast Conference Conference, Presidio of San Francisco

Posted by admin on Friday, March 5, 2010


I will be speaking this afternoon at the 9th Annual Allison Taylor Holbrooks/Barbara Joe Johnson Breast Cancer Conference: Beyond Breast Cancer - Golden Gate Club, The Presidio of San Francisco, 2:30 p.m. 

More slides from my presentation to follow...
More aboutThe Art of Breast Reconstruction - 9th Annual Breast Conference Conference, Presidio of San Francisco

Online Plastic Surgery consultations: Convenience or Trouble?

Posted by admin on Tuesday, January 26, 2010

A recent New York Times article discussed the potential merits and pitfalls of online consultations for Plastic Surgery procedures

This led me to think about my own practice.  I am currently listed on a number of websites that drive potential patients to my practice, from breast augmentation:


...to liposuction, tummy tucks, and other related sites where people can post questions and hear back from real Plastic Surgeons on their opinion about surgery.

I post my direct email (khorton@womensplasticsurgery.com) on these types of sites, and encourage potential patients to contact me directly with questions or comments. 

In response, I always send them a personal email reply with general information about my practice and advice to make an appointment to SEE ME in person, for a formal consultation, a full history and physical examination, and my surgical opinon about whether they are even a candidate for the procedure they believe they are seeking. 

Any initial questions about procedure cost and scheduling can be answered by my Patient Coordinator, whom contactees are also encouraged to call.

When I meet these patients in person, often the procedure they were seeking (for example, liposuction of the abdomen) may not in fact the appropriate procedure to achieve their aesthetic goals (an abdominoplasty, or tummy tuck may be indicated if they have rectus diastasis - separation of the rectus abdominis mucles in the midline from pregnancies).  Only an in-person evaluation can allow me to make this determination.

Some patients seeking Microsurgical breast reconstruction such as the DIEP/SIEA or TUG flap travel far and wide for surgery, and come from another state or even country for their surgery.  My Coordinator in these cases will often ask patients to send confidential photographs of their torso so that I can get a general idea of whether they are even a candidate for a free flap.  From here, we would consider asking them to make a trip to see me in the office for further evaluation. 

However, patients are still instructed that they will need to fly into San Francisco for a formal consultation and the standard 45-90 minute visit with me and the remainder of the office staff to fully learn about the procedure, its risks and benefits, potential complications and expected outcomes of surgery.  They would then plan their procedure and return for surgery in the future.

I feel that giving advice over the phone, over the internet, or via just looking at photographs is not only risky for the doctor or patient, but can provide a false diagnosis or sense of security. 

Medicolegally, potential Plastic Surgery patients seen to be seen and examined, in person, for proper documentation and examination, careful planning for surgery, and the best possible results.  
More aboutOnline Plastic Surgery consultations: Convenience or Trouble?

Imaginis - Advances in Breast Reconstruction

Posted by admin on Thursday, April 30, 2009


Advances in Breast Reconstruction


Microsurgery involves using a patient's own tissue (spare fat) for reconstruction as opposed to implants. While implant reconstruction and the TRAM flap procedure are still the standards of care in breast reconstruction, advances in microsurgery have shown promise. This article provides information on some of the newest procedures-DIEP, SIEA, and other reconstructive procedures including tug tuck, S-GAP, and I-GAP). Note, these procedures may not be available to all women considering breast reconstruction.

Editor's note: The content for this article was provided by Dr. Karen Horton of Women's Plastic Surgery, who practices in the Pacific Heights area of San Francisco.

Content was supplemented from information from the Buncke Clinic in San Francisco. Consistent with Imaginis.com's policies, the content was reviewed and edited by Imaginis.com Editorial Board to ensure neutrality. See the Additional Resources and References section for more information about these procedures.


DIEP FLAP Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric artery Perforator) flap microsurgical breast reconstruction uses a patient's own abdominal skin and fat to reconstruct a breast after mastectomy. DIEP refers to the blood vessel that supplies the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the lower abdomen, similar to the TRAM flap procedure. This is the same area of abdominal tissue that is discarded in patients that undergo cosmetic surgery for a "tummy tuck." However, unlike the TRAM flap procedure, the DIEP flap does not include any muscle in the flap. Instead, it is "perforator flap" meaning that it is supplied by blood vessels that travel within and perforate through the rectus abdominis muscle.

The DIEP flap is transplanted to the chest for breast reconstruction by microsurgically attaching the circulation to blood vessels in the chest. By giving the tissue circulation, it can remain soft and feel more like a normal breast. Because it is technically more complex than implant and TRAM flap surgery, it should only be performed in medical centers that routinely perform microsurgery.

Potential advantages of DIEP flap reconstruction may include:

  • Preservation of the rectus muscle. Thus, patients are less likely to experience abdominal muscle weakness, hernia or bulge postoperatively (though these side effects are still possible).
  • Preservation of the rectus sheath
  • Less post-operative pain compared to the TRAM flap procedure because the muscle is left in place and muscle fibers are gently spread apart to find the blood vessels that supply the flap.

Potential disadvantages of DIEP flap reconstruction may include:

  • The DIEP flap can only be performed by reconstructive microsurgeons who have special training and experience with microvascular anastomoses and free flaps.
  • Standard operating times for DIEP flap are 4-5 hours for a single ("unilateral") reconstruction, and up to 8-10 hours for a "bilateral" reconstruction (both sides). The time of surgery can be increased by 1-2 hours if the reconstruction is immediate (done at the same time as the mastectomy).
  • The DIEP flap is a "free flap" and involves "microsurgery". Microsurgery is surgery that is performed under the operating microscope. The flap tissue from the abdomen is isolated on its microvascular pedicle (one artery and one or two veins that bring blood supply to and from the tissue). The pedicle is isolated and then divided, effectively cutting off the blood supply to the flap. The flap is then transferred to the chest area and the blood vessels are reconnected (the "microvascular anastomosis") blood vessels in the chest region. With microsurgery, there is a small (3-5%) risk of failure of the microvascular anastomosis. If the blood vessels were to fail or clot off, a return to the operating room would be necessary to redo the anastomosis and to reestablish blood supply to the flap. In contrast, the TRAM flap has virtually no failure rate.
  • The hospital stay ranges from 3 to 5 days on average, depending on the speed of recovery and postoperative pain. This is in comparison to 1 to 2 days in hospital for an implant reconstruction.
  • The recovery time following a DIEP flap is longer than after an implant reconstruction. Generally, physically strenuous activities (running, aerobic activity, lifting more than 5 pounds) are to be avoided for 4-6 weeks after surgery. However, walking and light activities begin in hospital, and should continue at home following discharge from hospital.
  • Blood loss is usually minimal, but in a bilateral reconstruction, and together with a mastectomy, a blood transfusion may be required. Autogenous blood donation (donating 1-2 units of your own blood up before surgery) may be arranged up to 3 weeks before a bilateral reconstruction.

DIEP is not widely available but good candidates for the procedure include healthy, physically active, non-smoking patients with enough abdominal tissue to create a breast mound are good candidates for the DIEP flap. Often, women have excess abdominal skin and fat following pregnancy and also benefit from the tummy tuck closure. In addition, radiation of the breast prior to reconstruction or anticipated radiation following surgery is another indication for the DIEP flap procedure.

Smokers, patients with diabetes or blood clotting problems are not good candidates for microsurgery. Patients who have had a previous abdominoplasty, previous TRAM or DIEP flap do not have the tissue available for reconstruction using the abdominal skin and fat. Previous abdominal liposuction increases risks of complications with a DIEP flap, but it is not an absolute contraindication. Patients with very low body fat or an inadequate amount of abdominal tissue may not be candidates for the DIEP or SIEA flap to reconstruct a breast mound similar to their other breast. Rarely, the location and number of scars on the abdomen from previous surgery can interfere with the blood supply to a DIEP flap procedure.

SIEA FLAP Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction

SIEA (Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery) flap microsurgical breast reconstruction uses the same tissue as the DIEP flap but a different blood vessel system. While the DIEP flap uses the deep blood supply, the SIEA flap uses the superficial blood supply to the skin and fat of the abdomen. Although the abdominal tissue used is the same as the DIEP, the SIEA relies on a distinctive blood supply and requires less surgical dissection than the DIEP. However, the majority of patients are not candidates for the SIEA procedure. This is because only about 30% of people have an SIEA vessel that is visible during surgery and that can be used for microvascular anastomosis. This is not known until the time of surgery and cannot be tested preoperatively, but a Doppler exam can be helpful in predicting vessel presence. Patients who have had Cesarean sections are less likely to have SIEA vessels. In addition, patients would require large reconstructions with more than half of the abdominal skin and fat may not be eligible for SIEA flap reconstruction even if they have a SIEA vessel because the SIEA flap sometimes does not provide adequate circulation across the midline of the abdomen.

Potential advantages of SIEA flap reconstruction may include:

  • Preservation of the rectus sheath with no violation of the rectus sheath
  • Preservation of the rectus muscle with no violation of the rectus muscle
  • Less post-operative pain
  • Speedier recovery
  • Shorter surgical procedure than the DIEP flap

Other Free Flap Breast Reconstructive Procedures

The following breast reconstructive procedures are not considered "first line" reconstructive options but some women may be good candidates for the procedures based on their individual medical situation. Note that these procedures are also not widely available.

Tug Flap Breast Reconstruction

TUG (Transverse Upper Gracilis) flap reconstruction uses inner thigh area in the same distribution as a cosmetic inner thigh lift. It can be used to reconstruct small and medium breasts. While not widely available in the United States, some surgeons believe that the procedure provides for good breast contour and projection. In addition, the procedure provides for the potential for immediate nipple areola reconstruction, without tattooing.

S-GAP Flap Breast Reconstruction

The Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator (S-GAP) flap reconstruction uses skin and adipose tissue from the buttock. The amount of tissue available is less than that for the DIEP, SIEA and TUG flaps and is of firmer and more fibrous consistency. A change in position during surgery is required, the dissection of the flap is more technically challenging and the length of blood vessels available for microvascular anastomosis is shorter. It can result in a more conspicuous donor site contour abnormality.

I-GAP Flap Breast Reconstruction

Like the S-GAP flap, the I-GAP (Inferior Gluteal Artery Perforator) flap procedure uses tissue from the buttock though in a different vessel system. Also similar to the S-GAP flap procedure, the I-GAP requires a longer operating time, intraoperative change in position, and has a more significant donor site contour deformity when compared to free flaps from the abdomen or inner thigh.

Additional Resources and References

Update: June 29, 2008

This Article Can Be Found At:
http://www.imaginis.com/breasthealth/advances_breast_reconstruction.asp


More aboutImaginis - Advances in Breast Reconstruction

Welcome to Women's Plastic Surgery Blog!

Posted by admin on Saturday, February 21, 2009


Welcome to the new blog, Women's Plastic Surgery!

I will be entering weekly updates on all plastic surgery topics, relevant to my patients, women and to the public in general.

I am one member of a unique all-women Plastic Surgeon group, Women's Plastic Surgery.

See our website, http://womensplasticsurgery.com for information on our practice and as a more detailed reference for content posted in this blog.

I will be posting topics including details of common cosmetic surgery procedures, including breast augmentation, breast lift/reduction, liposuction, tummy tucks, and the "mommy makeover" spectrum of procedures.

Special attention will be paid to the latest breast cancer reconstruction techniques, as this is a major focus of my practice. You will learn about microsurgical reconstruction including the DIEP flap, SIEA flap, TUG (inner thigh) flap, and immediate single-stage implant reconstruction following mastectomy.

Keep in tune also for information about the latest facial rejuvenation techniques, including facelifts/browlifts, eyelid surgery (blepharoplasty), and non-invasive strategies such as Botox, fillers, lasers, and more!

I welcome your comments and look forward to hearing from you.

Karen M. Horton, M.D., M.Sc., F.R.C.S.C.
More aboutWelcome to Women's Plastic Surgery Blog!